PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 0259.HK at -14.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.39%
D&A growth well above 0259.HK's 9.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2130.10%
Slight usage while 0259.HK is negative at -1857.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with 0259.HK at -253.44%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-165.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with 0259.HK at -237.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-741.11%
Negative yoy while 0259.HK is 142.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
364.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 55.60%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with 0259.HK at -7.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while 0259.HK is 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-473.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with 0259.HK at -6.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-303.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while 0259.HK is 68.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-34.05%
Negative yoy issuance while 0259.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-39.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while 0259.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.