0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.51%
Net income growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 186.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-8.66%
Negative yoy D&A while 0259.HK is 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Well above 0259.HK's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with 0259.HK at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.00%
Slight usage while 0259.HK is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with 0259.HK at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while 0259.HK is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above 0259.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-193.37%
Both negative yoy, with 0259.HK at -213.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
19.78%
Some CFO growth while 0259.HK is negative at -81.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
49.36%
Some CapEx rise while 0259.HK is negative at -14.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-232.28%
We reduce yoy other investing while 0259.HK is 897.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-782.84%
We reduce yoy invests while 0259.HK stands at 289.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.