PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 132.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
237.32%
Some D&A expansion while 0259.HK is negative at -6.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 0259.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
134.79%
AR growth of 134.79% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-68.10%
Negative yoy inventory while 0259.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-138.77%
Negative yoy usage while 0259.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
266.88%
Some yoy increase while 0259.HK is negative at -203.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
33.34%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 64.98%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-35.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with 0259.HK at -47.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.80%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. 0259.HK's 1150.49%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
28.93%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. 0259.HK's 5176.16%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.