0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 798.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.39%
D&A growth of 10.39% while 0335.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2130.10%
Working capital change of 2130.10% while 0335.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Negative yoy inventory while 0335.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-165.75%
Negative yoy usage while 0335.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-741.11%
Both negative yoy, with 0335.HK at -102.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
364.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 172.83%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while 0335.HK is 91.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0335.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while 0335.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while 0335.HK is 2209.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-473.48%
We reduce yoy invests while 0335.HK stands at 3954.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-303.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while 0335.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-34.05%
Negative yoy issuance while 0335.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-39.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while 0335.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.