PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
16.52M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-56.25%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 62.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
189.32%
Some D&A expansion while 0376.HK is negative at -43.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.26%
Well above 0376.HK's 253.12% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.21%
Negative yoy inventory while 0376.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
293157.46%
Growth of 293157.46% while 0376.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
152.44%
Well above 0376.HK's 105.49%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
2136.72%
Some CFO growth while 0376.HK is negative at -41.60%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-100.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while 0376.HK is 66.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0376.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while 0376.HK is 133.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-235.09%
We reduce yoy invests while 0376.HK stands at 66.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
75.40%
We repay more while 0376.HK is negative at -50.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while 0376.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.