PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 17.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.39%
Less D&A growth vs. 3606.HK's 300.60%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2130.10%
Slight usage while 3606.HK is negative at -210.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with 3606.HK at -346.01%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-165.75%
Negative yoy usage while 3606.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-741.11%
Both negative yoy, with 3606.HK at -17.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
364.22%
Some CFO growth while 3606.HK is negative at -46.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-26.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while 3606.HK is 36.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 3606.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while 3606.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while 3606.HK is 426.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-473.48%
We reduce yoy invests while 3606.HK stands at 76.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-303.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while 3606.HK is 67.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-34.05%
Negative yoy issuance while 3606.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-39.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while 3606.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.