0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.44%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
18.68%
D&A growth of 18.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
103.42%
SBC growth of 103.42% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-233.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
433.54%
Inventory growth of 433.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-324.59%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
177.45%
Under 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 5.73% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-90.38%
Negative CFO growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
60.30%
CapEx growth of 60.30% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-100.00%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
112.36%
Growth of 112.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
119.63%
Investing flow of 119.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-44.38%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
99.48%
Issuance growth of 99.48% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.