PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-84.88%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
28.59%
D&A growth of 28.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2015.60%
SBC growth of 2015.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
618.97%
Working capital of 618.97% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.20%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
292.62%
Growth of 292.62% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
110.89%
Growth of 110.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
2536.42%
CFO growth of 2536.42% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
95.12%
CapEx growth of 95.12% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.61%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-393.27%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-274.26%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.