PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
10.39%
D&A growth of 10.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2130.10%
Working capital of 2130.10% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-165.75%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-741.11%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
364.22%
CFO growth of 364.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-26.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.02%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-473.48%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-303.51%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-34.05%
We reduce issuance yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-39.22%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.