0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.51%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-8.66%
D&A shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
100.00%
Working capital of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-100.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-193.37%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
19.78%
CFO growth of 19.78% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
49.36%
CapEx growth of 49.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-232.28%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-782.84%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.