0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1343.52%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative at -2.31%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
5.76%
D&A growth of 5.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-100.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-211.02%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
34.01%
Working capital of 34.01% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
1.07%
AR growth of 1.07% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
119.33%
Inventory growth of 119.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.32%
Growth of 30.32% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-318.49%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
13.50%
CFO growth of 13.50% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-38.90%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.99%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-466.02%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.