PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
92.45%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 20494.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
92.43%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.70%
Net income growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2936.69%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
82.62%
EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
82.62%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.32%
OCF growth of 73.32% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
71.94%
FCF growth of 71.94% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.55%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.