PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
100.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 20494.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-100.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 2936.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 2911.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 2910.42%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above 0259.HK's 17.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.