PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 20494.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 2936.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
0.77%
EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.77%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
149.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
149.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-6.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-6.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
30.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
30.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
30.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.25%
SG&A growth well above 0259.HK's 17.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.