0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.73%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-20.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
69.71%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 20494.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
69.71%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.02%
Net income growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2936.69%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
46.25%
EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
46.25%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.15%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-103.43%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-71.01%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-71.01%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-76.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
33.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
33.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-24.45%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
77.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
34.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.