PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 16.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-114.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
135.43%
Share change of 135.43% while 0259.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
135.43%
Diluted share change of 135.43% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 47.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 47.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 47.93%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
65.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 0259.HK's 64.06%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-108.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 64.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
74.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 64.06%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
165.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
138.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
243.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth well above 0259.HK's 224.63%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.