0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 265.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-114.93%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 997.68%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-114.99%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 1000.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.99%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 1000.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16816.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 116.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13431.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 70.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
214.53%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1724.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 194.38%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1810.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 112.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
899.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
20.09%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 2126.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
53.15%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 3321.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-129.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is 933.19%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.51%
Inventory growth well above 0259.HK's 5.32%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 4.57%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.05%
Similar to 0259.HK's 4.59%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
79.24%
Debt growth of 79.24% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.