PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.40%
Negative revenue growth while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.04%
Negative gross profit growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.66%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.68%
Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
600.81%
Net income growth of 600.81% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
542.31%
EPS growth of 542.31% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth of 542.31% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
12.62%
Share change of 12.62% while 0259.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
12.62%
Diluted share change of 12.62% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-89.20%
Dividend reduction while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-90.38%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-143.76%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
34936.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 116.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
16839.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 70.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
11.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-62.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 194.38%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
283.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 112.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-96.14%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
204.83%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 2126.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
59.56%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 3321.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-27.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is 933.19%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0259.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-32.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.91%
Negative asset growth while 0259.HK invests at 4.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.12%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
62.93%
Debt growth of 62.93% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.04%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.