Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0259.HK stands at 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0259.HK is at 20.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Operating income growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 87.48%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 28.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 81.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 605.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 178.98%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 177.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 1223.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 116.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Below 50% of 0259.HK's 69.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0259.HK stands at 909.57%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 236.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0259.HK invests at 101.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Debt growth of 38.08% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.

Our R&D shrinks while 0259.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.