PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Positive revenue growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
24.43%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-226.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-226.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3875.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3833.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3833.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.06%
Slight or no buybacks while 0259.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0259.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.97%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-14.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 63.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
10.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 1145.63%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-932.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
6.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
16.65%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 195.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-645.85%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-245.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
445.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 323.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
28.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 54.78%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0259.HK is at 15.81%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0259.HK stands at 845.36%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
AR growth well above 0259.HK's 7.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.89%
We show growth while 0259.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
30.20%
Positive asset growth while 0259.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.39%
We have a declining book value while 0259.HK shows 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.09%
Debt growth far above 0259.HK's 27.55%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
435.21%
R&D growth of 435.21% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
11.64%
We expand SG&A while 0259.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.