Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0259.HK stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0259.HK is at 89.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 169.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 169.28%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 33.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 34.53%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 34.15%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Dividend reduction while 0259.HK stands at 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 101.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 204.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 96.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 2211.46%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 81.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 9332.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 228.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is 13.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0259.HK is at 64.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0259.HK is at 18.23%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0259.HK stands at 899.96%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Inventory growth well above 0259.HK's 20.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

We have a declining book value while 0259.HK shows 6.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Our R&D shrinks while 0259.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.