PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Positive revenue growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 20494.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2991.74%
Net income growth comparable to 0259.HK's 2936.69%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
2880.00%
EPS growth similar to 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
2860.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.27%
Slight or no buybacks while 0259.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-66.05%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-69.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
36.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
125.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1534.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
19.37%
Positive growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-6.83%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-3.85%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
14.65%
AR growth well above 0259.HK's 20.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-19.50%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0259.HK's 36.74%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
83.53%
We have some new debt while 0259.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
18.55%
R&D growth of 18.55% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.63%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.