PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 504.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.98%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 511.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 907.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 540.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2991.74%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2880.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2860.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above 0335.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
100.00%
OCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 227.47%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
100.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 234.54%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-66.05%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-69.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 79.12%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 160.73%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 78.67%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
36.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
125.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1534.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
19.37%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 92.05%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 5.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0335.HK invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
14.65%
AR growth of 14.65% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-19.50%
Inventory is declining while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.10%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 2.36%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
83.53%
We have some new debt while 0335.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
18.55%
R&D growth of 18.55% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.