0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 504.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
100.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 511.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 907.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-100.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 540.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-100.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 227.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 234.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 79.12%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
46.64%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 160.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
46.64%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 78.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while 0335.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.