PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 504.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 511.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0335.HK's 907.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 540.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
26.79%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
26.48%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
26.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 234.54%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
5.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
5.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
498.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 79.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
498.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 160.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
498.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 78.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-71.73%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-71.73%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-71.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0335.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.