0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Revenue growth of 50.07% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-10.89%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.72%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-55.48%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-64.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
21.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
85.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
51.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
60.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A growth of 32.39% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.