PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 32.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 32.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 42.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 85.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-512.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 85.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-71.49%
Share reduction while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-71.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
25.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
327.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1.34%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.04%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-55.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.02%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-70.56%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-37.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
We cut SG&A while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.