PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 169.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 37.66%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 37.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
135.43%
Share change of 135.43% while 0335.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
135.43%
Diluted share change of 135.43% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-12.15%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
60.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
65.71%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-108.61%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
74.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
165.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
138.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
243.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth of 344.28% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.