0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17045.22%
Revenue growth of 17045.22% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
4822.56%
Gross profit growth of 4822.56% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
100.00%
EBIT growth of 100.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
323.00%
Operating income growth of 323.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
237.25%
Net income growth of 237.25% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
913.95%
EPS growth of 913.95% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
913.95%
Diluted EPS growth of 913.95% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
18.11%
Share change of 18.11% while 0335.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
18.11%
Diluted share change of 18.11% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
698.72%
OCF growth of 698.72% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-57.51%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6634.46%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
18313.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22601.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
186.90%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
365.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
10.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
193.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
316.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
859.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
367.08%
SG&A growth of 367.08% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.