PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.53%
Positive operating income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-152.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-152.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-152.37%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33031.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
57042.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
10507.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 425.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3940.88%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2991.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3890.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 280.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-77.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-288.23%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-50.12%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.