0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 28.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-114.93%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 28.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-114.99%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 28.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.99%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 28.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16816.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
13431.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 255.79%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
214.53%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1724.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1810.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 165.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
899.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
20.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
53.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-129.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.51%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0335.HK's 653.21%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
9.93%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 7.08%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.05%
50-75% of 0335.HK's 9.50%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
79.24%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0335.HK's 316.00%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.