PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 20.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-6.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Net income growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 215.83%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.45%
EPS growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 215.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.45%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 215.17%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above 0335.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Dividend reduction while 0335.HK stands at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 3041.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 7635.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
193.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-14.66%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1287.21%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
347.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
202.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 76.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
314.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-1.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 84.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
148.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0335.HK's 215.80%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 26.89%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0335.HK invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
We show growth while 0335.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-10.76%
Negative asset growth while 0335.HK invests at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.50%
Under 50% of 0335.HK's 12.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.07%
Debt growth far above 0335.HK's 8.82%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0335.HK's 107.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.