PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.70%
Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.77%
Positive gross profit growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
105.96%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 0.86%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
105.96%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 26.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
322.84%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
330.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
344.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.33%
Share reduction while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.02%
Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.51%
OCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 251.20%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
276.82%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 251.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
87778.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
13.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4300.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1020.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 12.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
4574.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 211.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
660.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-48.70%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-43.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
538.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 538.69% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
104.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 20.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 142.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
46.46%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 260.06%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
3.48%
AR growth of 3.48% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
21.91%
Inventory growth of 21.91% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.59%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 0.07%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
18.28%
Positive BV/share change while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.26%
We’re deleveraging while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
314.74%
R&D growth of 314.74% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
4.92%
We expand SG&A while 0335.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.