PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 175.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.80%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 175.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
85.33%
EBIT growth 50-75% of 0335.HK's 145.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
85.33%
Positive operating income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
87.44%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
62.43%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
62.43%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
15.43%
Share count expansion well above 0335.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
15.37%
Diluted share change of 15.37% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-698.01%
Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 59.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-308.72%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 59.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
11795.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 680.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-12.09%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 119.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 912.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-9561.15%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-664.88%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1361.38%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
233.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
384.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-14.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 89.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 0335.HK's 63.05%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 100.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-18.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
30.58%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0335.HK's 16733.33%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.55%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.59%
Positive BV/share change while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-99.86%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-35.78%
Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-46.41%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.