PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
52.56%
Positive gross profit growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
90.29%
Positive EBIT growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
90.29%
Positive operating income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1343.52%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1220.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1240.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.83%
Slight or no buybacks while 0335.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.60%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
13.50%
Positive OCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.76%
Positive FCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-62.99%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-62.26%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-48.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-373.36%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 92.09%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-31.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 15340.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
37.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9.63%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-44.38%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-87.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
25.71%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 91.16%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-17.40%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 5.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
21.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 5.10%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.32% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.88%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.57%
Negative asset growth while 0335.HK invests at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.89%
50-75% of 0335.HK's 1.21%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
4.18%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0335.HK's 138.26%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
47.15%
R&D growth of 47.15% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
51.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0335.HK's 20650.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.