PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 18.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
0.77%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
0.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
149.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
149.84%
3Y CAGR of 149.84% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-6.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-6.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-6.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
30.80%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 0360.HK's 31.09%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
30.80%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 83.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 30.80% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.25%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0360.HK's 99.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.