0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-57.73%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 18.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-57.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-513.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-513.63%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-238.98%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-239.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-239.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
473.30%
Positive OCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
434.86%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-47.19%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-47.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
299.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
299.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
299.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 299.19% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-17.28%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 31.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is 83.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-17.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.40%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 99.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.