0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.73%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 18.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
69.71%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
69.71%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.02%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
46.25%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
46.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.15%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-103.43%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-71.01%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-71.01%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
33.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
33.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
77.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 31.09% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
77.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0360.HK's 83.27%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.04% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 99.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.