0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-512.90%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-71.49%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-71.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 122.66%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 122.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
327.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 122.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-1.34%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.04%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-55.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 74.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-70.56%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is 74.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 74.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.