0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.01%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 5.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-29.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1377.55%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1247.29%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
342.74%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
175.79%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
175.79%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
85.89%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 10.80%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
85.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 9.90%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.08%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-703.40%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 14.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
9.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 5.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
106.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 5.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
276.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 5.59%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
59.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-120.26%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
39.22%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
177.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
165.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
437.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-241.39%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 2.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.