PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.47%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 88.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-97.68%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-97.61%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-97.61%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34936.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 338.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
39780.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 107.46%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
11.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 85.84%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.82%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
532.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-96.14%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
103.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-91.27%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
103.23%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
141.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0360.HK's 115.10%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.56%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 17.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.42%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0360.HK's 42.25%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
11.97%
Under 50% of 0360.HK's 26.61%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
144.87%
Debt growth far above 0360.HK's 121.55%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.