PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.83%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.90%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6.20%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0360.HK's 55.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
35.35%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-19.07%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 41.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.25%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-10.94%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.43%
Reduced diluted shares while 0360.HK is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
349.14%
Dividend growth of 349.14% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.11%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-271.62%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
82239.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 53.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
44.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0360.HK's 30.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
12.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
565.21%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-83.91%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-64.35%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
467.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-54.74%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 159.83%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.68%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-88.67%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.99%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.78%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
18.40%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-30.04%
We’re deleveraging while 0360.HK stands at 8.18%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.