PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.52%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 15.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-43.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-40.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-82.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-80.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-82.21%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.43%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 193.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 193.64%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
364.22%
Positive OCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
237.08%
Positive FCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75929.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 21.08%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
33.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
4.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2432.89%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-19.33%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
78.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
170.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
118.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
158.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.50%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
102.05%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.56%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
9.36%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
24.71%
We have some new debt while 0360.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-71.23%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0360.HK's 12.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.