PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.70%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.77%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 26.01%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
105.96%
EBIT growth similar to 0360.HK's 101.23%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
105.96%
Operating income growth similar to 0360.HK's 101.23%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
322.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 92.62%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
330.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 94.71%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
344.83%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 94.82%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.33%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 40.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.02%
Reduced diluted shares while 0360.HK is at 43.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.51%
Similar OCF growth to 0360.HK's 124.32%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
276.82%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 97.52%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
87778.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
13.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4300.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1020.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
4574.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 113.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
660.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-48.70%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-43.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
538.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
104.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
46.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 46.46% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.48%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
21.91%
Inventory growth well above 0360.HK's 1.79%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.59%
Positive asset growth while 0360.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
18.28%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
314.74%
We increase R&D while 0360.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.92%
We expand SG&A while 0360.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.