PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.56%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.40%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
21.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0360.HK's 108.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
21.32%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 108.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
66.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 8.15%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
67.59%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
67.59%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.74%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.67%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.08%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-816.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
47933.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
9.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-4802.15%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-181.71%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-137.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
387.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-73.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-43.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 98.45%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0360.HK's 120.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
54.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.59%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
141.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 141.46% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
24.83%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-12.51%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 7.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
21.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 1.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.64%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 0.57%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
281.70%
Debt growth far above 0360.HK's 17.10%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
75.26%
R&D growth of 75.26% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
7.69%
We expand SG&A while 0360.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.