PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.54%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-15.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.53%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 65.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-30.53%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 65.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2.50%
Net income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 101.22%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.99%
EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 101.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
-4.19%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 101.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.44%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 0.32%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.94%
Positive OCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
37.76%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 2.37%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
247.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
19.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-10.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-6520.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 80.16%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-394.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 29.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-261.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
17.38%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.23%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 100.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
59.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0360.HK's 103.63%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.28%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.65%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
578.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 578.71% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
120.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 120.50% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
44.39%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-44.69%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
14.57%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 1.98%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
206.46%
Debt growth far above 0360.HK's 7.53%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-36.19%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.