PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Revenue growth of 39.61% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
17.91%
Gross profit growth of 17.91% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
66.33%
EBIT growth of 66.33% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
66.33%
Operating income growth of 66.33% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.19%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-47.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-40.81%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
33.34%
OCF growth of 33.34% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
22.09%
FCF growth of 22.09% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
30.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
16.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-267.39%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-307.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.33%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
135.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
97.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0360.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-59.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
418.24%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
52.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
23.32%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0360.HK's 143.90%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.93%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 118.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.51%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0360.HK's 38.08%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
69.47%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-22.54%
We’re deleveraging while 0360.HK stands at 94.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
97.36%
R&D growth of 97.36% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.83%
SG&A growth of 9.83% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.