PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
24.43%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-226.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-226.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3875.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3833.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3833.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.06%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Dividend growth of 15.66% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-11.97%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 124.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.76%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 453.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-14.04%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
10.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-2249.52%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-932.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
6.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 742.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
16.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-645.85%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-245.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 33.02%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
445.96%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
28.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 7.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0360.HK is at 51.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.89%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
30.20%
Positive asset growth while 0360.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
50.09%
We have some new debt while 0360.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
435.21%
R&D growth of 435.21% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
11.64%
SG&A growth well above 0360.HK's 2.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.