PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.95%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-48.58%
Negative gross profit growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-122.15%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-122.15%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-112.71%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-111.92%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-111.92%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.84%
Share change of 5.84% while 0360.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
5.85%
Diluted share change of 5.85% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-1.18%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.66%
OCF growth of 21.66% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
22.08%
FCF growth of 22.08% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-40.24%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-52.05%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
20.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 154.10%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-6853.77%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 88.99%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-29.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 64.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-75.23%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-114.02%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-118.06%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-148.19%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
90.48%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-2.50%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
38.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-24.01%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-60.78%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-60.06%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-20.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.44%
Inventory growth well above 0360.HK's 3.16%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
8.83%
BV/share growth of 8.83% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
7.92%
We have some new debt while 0360.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
15.24%
R&D growth of 15.24% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-27.52%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.