PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.74%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 38.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
44.00%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 67.45%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
175.08%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
175.08%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
228.07%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
228.28%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
228.28%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 9.20%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 0360.HK is at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-99.98%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-63.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.45%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-51.09%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
8.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-51.44%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-2256.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-2477.32%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
5.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-9.39%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 98.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
37.21%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 93.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
153.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 77.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
65.53%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
71.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 123.28%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-9.27%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-99.92%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.99%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
9.71%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.97%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.97%
Negative asset growth while 0360.HK invests at 62.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.25%
Under 50% of 0360.HK's 266.84%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-16.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-32.73%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.50%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 48.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.